American Printer's mission is to be the most reliable and authoritative source of information on integrating tomorrow's technology with today's management.

Jan 1, 2006 12:00 AM
Prepress
Many printers have successfully implemented color management
programs. They’ve profiled monitors, proofing devices and
presses and proven they can get a good color match from one device
to another. But despite these programs, some printers still are
struggling to maintain consistent color throughout a press run.
Have you ever had a customer fan out a job, revealing colors that
don’t match from sheet to sheet? It’s a common problem,
one that all printers eventually encounter.
Why is maintaining consistent color so difficult? At any given
time, the press operator is contending with print variables such as
ink density, dot gain, gray balance and print contrast. And
that’s just the press; using less than optimum paper stock
further compounds the color challenge. This article can be used as
the initial steps toward ensuring the first good sheet matches the
last good sheet of a press run as closely as possible.
Roots of consistency are planted in prepress There are two basic
steps you can take to maintain consistent image color during a
press run. First, evaluate your color separation process.
Converting images from an RGB or LAB to a CMYK color space involves
more than merely changing Photoshop modes. You have to consider the
ink and paper as well as the condition of the press. (See “Does painless RGB to CMYK conversion
exist?” June 2005.)
Gray component replacement (GCR) and undercolor removal (UCR)
determine how much cyan, magenta and yellow are replaced with black
when an image is converted to the CMYK color space.
UCR reduces the amount of cyan, magenta, and yellow primarily in
the shadow areas of an image and increases the black. UCR will
affect only the neutral areas of the image—it has no effect
on the color areas of a printed reproduction. It helps alleviate
potential printing problems associated with heavy ink coverage such
as set off or blocking.
By contrast, GCR is more aggressive—it affects the neutral
and color areas throughout the entire image. GCR replaces the gray
component of the trichromatic colors with black during color
separation. (A trichromatic color is any color that is made up of
all three primary printing colors: cyan, magenta and yellow.) The
gray component of the trichromatic colors is the level to which all
three primaries are equally present. Applying GCR replaces the
tertiary color with black (Figure 1).
A GCR separation has all of the advantages of a UCR separation with one important additional benefit: A GCR separation will print more consistently throughout a press run. This is especially useful for high-speed web presses, where a color shift on press could affect many sheets in a short period of time. Long-run sheetfed work also will benefit, yielding consistent, repeatable color during the entire press run. Additionally, there are cost savings associated with GCR because the more expensive cyan, magenta and yellow inks are replaced with the cheaper black.
The ultimate challenge: four-color gray
Four-color gray is one of the most difficult images to keep in
color balance throughout a press run. A four-color gray is a
black-and-white image reproduced using cyan, magenta, yellow and
black. Figure 2 illustrates the color stability benefits of
GCR vs. UCR. Figure 2a was separated using UCR; Figure 2b was
separated using GCR. The images immediately below have a five
percent magenta shift in the midtones, simulating a dramatic color
shift on press. Note the shift in color on the UCR separation,
while the GCR separation is still neutral.
GCR relies on the black separation (instead of equal amounts of
cyan, magenta and yellow) to achieve neutral grays within
trichromatic colors. The result is more consistent color throughout
the press run. Apply GCR to a “normal” color image, and
color shifts on press will have little effect on the images.
The major benefit of GCR is maintaining thecolor balance of images
during a press run. Note, however, that GCR reduces or eliminates
the operator’s ability to make color adjustments on press.
GCR shouldn’t be used if you have customers who expect press
operators to “correct” color during press checks.
Following guidelines to control color on press
Conforming to print specifications is the second step toward
achieving consistent color. Specifications define target reference
values for press variables such as paper type, solid ink density,
dot gain and print contrast.
Many printers do not include color bars along with the work on the
printed sheet, preferring to rely on the press operator’s
assessment of color match and consistency. But measuring the color
bar eliminates guesswork, providing measurable numeric values, or
aim points, for the press operator.
SNAP, GRACoL, and SWOP
In the late 1960s and early 1970s, web offset printing was growing
by leaps and bounds. Nonetheless, printers were struggling with
films and proofs that were impossible to match on press. The
problem was that the prepress houses providing these materials
didn’t know exactly what the printers required—they
essentially took their best guess and hoped for the best. Color
issues escalated—printers couldn’t color match
advertisements supplied from various sources on the same side of
the press sheet. Needless to say, the advertisers were
unhappy.
In late 1974, various industry experts formed a committee to create
specifications for material being supplies to web offset printers.
Guidelines known as Specifications for Web Offset Publications
(SWOP) were developed.
The SWOP organization’s specification represents an
industry-wide agreement and is a result of various organizations
and industry committees. Changes are constantly being made to the
SWOP specification as the printing industry evolves, and it is
updated on a regular basis.
Subsequently, other guidelines have been defined for newspaper
printing: Specifications for Newspaper Printing (SNAP); and for
commercial offset printing: General Requirements in the Application
of Commercial Offset Lithography (GRACoL) (see chart).
| Print Characterization Chart | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suggested Input Variables | Output Print Characteristics | |||||||||||||
| Paper/ Sub- strate |
LPI= Line Screen |
TAC= Total Area Cover- age |
SID= Solid Ink Density |
PC=Print Contrast | TVI=Total Dot Gain % | |||||||||
| K | C | M | Y | K | C | M | Y | K | C | M | Y | |||
| Grades 1 and 2 premium gloss/ dull coated |
175 | 320% | 1.70 | 1.40 | 1.50 | 1.05 | 40-45 | 35-40 | 35-40 | 30-35 | 22 | 20 | 20 | 18 |
| Grades 1 and 2 premium matte coated | 150-175 | 300-320% | 1.60 | 1.30 | 1.40 | 1.00 | 40-45 | 35-40 | 35-40 | 30-35 | 24 | 22 | 22 | 20 |
| Premium text and cover (smooth) | 150-175 | 260% | 1.30 | 1.15 | 1.15 | 0.90 | 35-45 | 30-40 | 30-40 | 25-35 | 26 | 22 | 22 | 20 |
| Grade #3 coated | 150 | 310% | 1.65 | 1.35 | 1.45 | 1.02 | 45 | 40 | 40 | 35 | 22 | 21 | 22 | 18 |
| Grade #5 coated (SWOP) | 133 | 300% | 1.60 | 1.30 | 1.40 | 1.00 | 35-45 | 30-40 | 30-40 | 25-35 | 22 | 20 | 20 | 18 |
| Supercal SCA+ | 133 | 280% | 1.50 | 1.25 | 1.35 | 1.00 | 23 | 21 | 21 | 20 | 28 | 26 | 26 | 24 |
| Supercal SCB | 120 | 240-260% | 1.35 | 1.10 | 1.15 | 0.95 | 20 | 19 | 19 | 18 | 28 | 26 | 26 | 24 |
| Uncoated offset | 110 | 240-260% | 1.25 | 1.00 | 1.12 | 0.95 | 20 | 17 | 16 | 17 | 28 | 26 | 26 | 24 |
| News- print (SNAP) |
85 | 240% | 1.05 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.85 | 16 | 13 | 12 | 15 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| News- print (heatset) |
100 | 240% | 1.20 | 1.08 | 1.15 | 0.95 | 16 | 13 | 12 | 15 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 |
Conform or else!
Prior to digital proofing, analog color proofs were made from
sheets of high-contrast film. The colorants and dot gains were
built into the proof and could not be adjusted. The analog proof
was given to the press operator with very specific orders: Force
the press to match the proof. Generally speaking, the press
operator did not have to conform to a specification. It
didn’t matter how the press operator got there, as long as
the color on the printed sheet matched the proof. In this workflow,
the analog proof was the control from which the rest of the process
was built.
Today, regardless of the specification used, the most critical
component of the process is ensuring that your operators actually
conform to that specification. Printing to the numbers will
result in more consistent color—but only if you follow the
specification from job to job, shift to shift and day to day.
In the digital workflow, all calibration in prepress is defined by
how the press prints. The platesetter (by building curves) and the
digital proof (via a profile or by building curves) are calibrated
based on the press’s print characteristics. In the digital
workflow, the press sheet is the control from which the rest of the
process is built. Failure to run consistently to a specification in
the pressroom will render digital proofs and plates useless.
The specifications’ Print Characterization Chart groups
commercial printing into various categories that correlate directly
with the grade of paper to be printed. The idea is that the paper
types defined in the Print Characterization Chart will cover the
vast majority of market needs, improving communication between
client and printer.
The print characterization chart can be broken into two major
sections: input and output variables. The input variables, or
prepress aim points, consist of the line screen and recommended
total area coverage in which the job will print:
Prepress and press must cooperate
Controlling color variation on press requires prepress and the
pressroom to work closely together. If you decide to start
separating color using GCR, it’s important to discuss the
change with your press operators. Start by running a set of test
images on press. Select images that are representative of typical
jobs, separate them using various amounts of GCR, and evaluate the
results on press.
Additionally, if the decision is made to print to a specification
in the pressroom, it is important for management to provide the
press operators with the necessary tools. Equip your pressroom with
the proper color measurement devices (such as a densitometer) and
provide color bars with the printed job. Implementing both of these
concepts—separating color using GCR and printing to a
specification—will dramatically improve color consistency on
press.
GCR at a glance
Gray component replacement (GCR) is total undercolor removal. GCR
reduces cyan, magenta, and yellow in the neutral and trichromatic
color throughout an image. Note that:
FOR FURTHER READING
SWOP, IDEAlliance join forces
SWOP (Specifications for Web Offset Publications) (Alexandria, VA)
has announced a merger with IDEAlliance (Intl. Digital Enterprise
Alliance) (Alexandria, VA), an association of advertising agencies,
printers, publishers and technology partners. Working within the
IDEAlliance infrastructure, SWOP plans to chart a new course
through training initiatives, technical specifications and SWOP
certification programs.
According to Nubar Nakashian, chairman of SWOP, “Merging with
IDEAlliance will provide synergy for both SWOP and IDEAlliance
programs. Working together, we can extend the reach of
specifications and guidelines across the printing
industry.”
SWOP and IDEAlliance began working together in early 2004 to
develop common marketing, publishing, ordering and fulfillment
mechanisms. The new IDEAlliance SWOP Program is composed of the
IDEAlliance SWOP Advisory Board (formerly the SWOP Board of
Directors) and the IDEAlliance SWOP Review Network (formerly the
SWOP Review Committee).
SWOP: Specification for Web Offset Publications (10th
Edition)
The updated booklet, which features a bold new design and colorful
graphics, provides the latest information on the use and handling
of digital files (including CTP) and the SWOP Proof Certification
Program. SWOP 2005 incorporates new digital specs and a complete
new Reference Section. See www.printtools.org.
Like a BRIDG over troubled cyan
BRIDG’S “Color Handbook” has been updated with
eight pages of new material and a complete redesign. The book is an
introduction to color, explaining what it is, and how it is
measured and managed. Other BRIDG’s guides cover halftone
screening, digital workflow, color management, proofing and
computer-to-plate. See www.printtools.org.
Learn the basics
Abhay Sharma’s book, “Understanding Color
Management,” explains the basics of color science and reviews
a wide range of profiling hardware and software options. The book
also details International Color Consortium (ICC) color
management—what it is, how it works and how to use it. See
www.amazon.com/colormanagement.
In the real world
Peachpit has published the second edition of “Real World
Color Management,” by Bruce Fraser, Chris Murphy and Fred
Bunting. It covers everything from color theory and color models to
understanding how devices interpret and display color. You’ll
find expert advice for building and fine-tuning color profiles for
input and output devices (digital cameras and scanners, displays,
printers, and more), selecting the right color management workflow,
and managing color within and across major design applications.
According to one online reviewer: “The book empowers you to make thoughtful choices on every Photoshop setting (black-points, colorspaces, rendering intents, etc). The section on evaluating profiles is excellent.” See www.peachpit.com.
Joseph Marin is a senior prepress technologist and instructor for PIA/GATF. Contact him at jmarin@piagatf.org.